Please call, fax, and tweet the members of the CA Assembly Appropriations Committee to Vote NO on #SB107. Contact info here
Here are their Twitter handles and some sample tweets:
@ChrisHoldenNews,@FrankBigelowCA, @IsaacgBryan, @AsmLisaCalderon,@AsmCarrillo, @AsmMeganDahle, @AsmLaurieDavies, @AsmMikeFong,@AsmVinceFong,@AsmJesseGabriel,@AsmEGarciaAD56, @AsmMarcLevine,@AsmBillQuirk,@AsmRobertRivas,@asmakilahweber
Also, here are the members of the Health Committee's Twitter accounts also:
@JimWoodAd2, @MarieWaldron75, @AsmAguiarCurry, @drarambulaAD31, @FrankBigelowCA, @AsmCarrillo, @HeathFloraCA, @Bmaienschein, @ChadMayes, @AsmKevinMcCarty, @adrin_nazarian, @AsmLuzRivas, @AsmRodriguez52, @SantiagoAD53
Here are some tweets to tweet re #SB107:
@ChrisHoldenNews I oppose #SB107 bc it aids&abets criminal acts,kidnapping, injuring of minors, facilitating unscientific &untested experimentation on children."Gender-affirming care" is a euphemism 4life-altering,irreversible& mutilating invasive procedures VOTE NO!
@FrankBigelowCA I oppose #SB107 bc it usurps parental authority & substitutes state authority over minors by empowering CA family courts to assert jurisdiction &authority over children who come to CA even as runaways in order to receive “gender-affirming care” VOTE NO!
@IsaacgBryan I oppose #SB107 bc it prohibits CA law enforcement agencies from enforcing arrest warrants from states restricting “gender-affirming health care” 4 violations of those state’s laws &allows them 2flee to CA to evade prosecution &receive full immunity VOTE NO!!
@AsmLisaCalderon I oppose #SB107 bc it prevents the prosecution of those who transport out-of-state minors into CA 4 radical medical procedures w/o parental consent or parents who take their children out-of-state in violation of custody/visitation orders VOTE NO!
@AsmCarrillo I oppose #SB107 bc it not only puts minors in harm's way, but undermines their relationship with their parents and the ability of other states to attempt to reverse this dangerous trend, inviting conflict and lawsuits VOTE NO!
@AsmMeganDahle I oppose #SB107 bc it aids&abets criminal acts,kidnapping, injuring of minors, facilitating unscientific &untested experimentation on children."Gender-affirming care" is a euphemism 4life-altering,irreversible& mutilating invasive procedures VOTE NO!
@AsmLaurieDavies I oppose #SB107 bc it usurps parental authority & substitutes state authority over minors by empowering CA family courts to assert jurisdiction &authority over children who come to CA even as runaways in order to receive “gender-affirming care” VOTE NO!
@AsmMikeFong I oppose #SB107 bc it prohibits CA law enforcement agencies from enforcing arrest warrants from states restricting “gender-affirming health care” 4 violations of those state’s laws &allows them 2flee to CA to evade prosecution &receive full immunity VOTE NO!!
@AsmVinceFong I oppose #SB107 bc it prevents the prosecution of those who transport out-of-state minors into CA 4 radical medical procedures w/o parental consent or parents who take their children out-of-state in violation of custody/visitation orders VOTE NO!
@AsmJesseGabriel I oppose #SB107 bc it not only puts minors in harm's way, but undermines their relationship with their parents and the ability of other states to attempt to reverse this dangerous trend, inviting conflict and lawsuits VOTE NO!
@AsmEGarciaAD56 I oppose #SB107 bc it aids&abets criminal acts,kidnapping, injuring of minors, facilitating unscientific &untested experimentation on children."Gender-affirming care" is a euphemism 4life-altering,irreversible& mutilating invasive procedures VOTE NO!
@MarcLevine I oppose #SB107 bc it usurps parental authority & substitutes state authority over minors by empowering CA family courts to assert jurisdiction &authority over children who come to CA even as runaways in order to receive “gender-affirming care” VOTE NO!
@AsmBillQuirk I oppose #SB107 bc it prohibits CA law enforcement agencies from enforcing arrest warrants from states restricting “gender-affirming health care” 4 violations of those state’s laws &allows them 2flee to CA to evade prosecution &receive full immunity VOTE NO!!
@RobertRivas I oppose #SB107 bc it prevents the prosecution of those who transport out-of-state minors into CA 4 radical medical procedures w/o parental consent or parents who take their children out-of-state in violation of custody/visitation orders VOTE NO!
@asmakilahweber I oppose #SB107 bc it not only puts minors in harm's way, but undermines their relationship with their parents and the ability of other states to attempt to reverse this dangerous trend, inviting conflict and lawsuits VOTE NO!